Key Points
- Kenneth Law, 61, has been indicted in Ontario for 14 counts of aiding suicide in Canada.
- Law pleaded guilty of providing lethal substances which led to the death of 79 people in the UK, one of them a woman from Cardiff, Wales.
- There were about 1,200 packages dispatched to 40 different countries in total sales of $290,000 from 2020 to 2023.
- 74 victim impact statements were read over four days in Newmarket court commencing 23 September 2026.
- However, there won’t be separate charges in the UK due to the issues of double jeopardy and extradition, although the number of UK deaths will play part in sentencing.
- The maximum jail time in Canada for aiding suicide is 14 years, although the submissions at sentencing may request a harsher sentence according to the extent of the crime.
- He was running several websites and using the pseudonym “Greenberg” on the forums for suicide where he advertised his lethal substances.
- An individual who survived, Elisabeth Belien, stated how she had been manipulated and how badly it hurt her psychologically.
Cardiff Crime (Wales Times) September 24, 2026 The sentencing hearing for Kenneth Law, a 61-year-old former chef from Mississauga, began at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Newmarket on 23 September 2026, with families delivering harrowing victim impact statements after Law pleaded guilty in May to 14 counts of aiding suicide in the province. As reported by Paola Loriggio of The Canadian Press, relatives described lives “shattered by grief” after their loved ones died using toxic chemicals purchased from Law’s online operations. Law admitted in court documents to shipping about 1,200 packages to more than 40 countries, with prosecutors saying 79 deaths in the United Kingdom would also be considered as part of the sentencing facts.
- Key Points
- Who were the victims and what did families tell the court?
- Why won’t Kenneth Law face separate charges in the UK?
- How did Kenneth Law operate his online business?
- What did survivors and families say about the impact?
- Background to the development
- Prediction: how this development can affect families, policymakers and online platforms
The hearing is scheduled to run over four days, with 74 victim impact statements to be heard in person, by video or read by the Crown, before lawyers present sentencing arguments on 27 November, after which the judge will impose a sentence. Under Canada’s Criminal Code, those convicted of counselling or aiding suicide face up to 14 years’ imprisonment, though the scale of Law’s conduct has led families and prosecutors to argue for a sentence that reflects the breadth of harm across jurisdictions.
Who were the victims and what did families tell the court?
Families from Canada and the UK detailed the loss of children, siblings and only children, many of whom were in their teens or twenties. As reported by WalesOnline, Kate and Graham Tucker said the death of their 14-year-old son Henry in October 2021 had “irreparably fractured” their lives after he bought a toxic substance from Law for $876 and received it a week later. Henry had been misdiagnosed multiple times before being identified with PANS/PANDAS, conditions that can cause sudden behavioural changes due to immune-related brain inflammation, and his parents said they believed he was safe and recovering in his bedroom.
Alison O’Donoghue’s video statement described her 21-year-old son Alex, a university student found dead in Warwick University accommodation in February 2022, as “beautiful, funny, gentle” and said his last words, “I’m scared,” would haunt the family. Norson Harris, whose 26-year-old daughter Ashleigh died in the UK in 2023 after collapsing outside hospital, told the court Law should have told vulnerable people they were loved and that help was available. Sandy Windsor said her 29-year-old son Tom died alone after calling emergency services to say he had ingested poison, while David Parfett described his 22-year-old son Thomas as a football fan who “saw the joy in life” before dying in a Surrey hotel in 2021.
In Canada, Leonardo Bedoya Forero said he now lives knowing that a person seeking help can instead encounter someone who “paves a path to death,” referring to the loss of his 18-year-old daughter Jeshennia Bedoya-Lopez. Stephen Mitchell Sr said Law deprived his 21-year-old son of the chance to heal from depression, and Adrienne Dalli said she had lost not only her 36-year-old brother Maurizio Vadala but the only other person who shared her childhood memories. The father of UK victim Ashleigh Harris travelled to Ontario to speak in person, while Chloe Davidson, sister of 21-year-old Megan Davidson, described the “earth-shattering” cycle of brief normality followed by reminders of the catastrophe after Megan died in hospital in 2022.
Why won’t Kenneth Law face separate charges in the UK?
UK prosecutors have confirmed that Law will not face charges in Britain despite admitting to a role in 79 deaths there, a decision that has angered some families. As reported by Sean Dilley, Christina McSorley and Olivia Ireland of the BBC, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) agreed to the Canadian plea bargain on the basis that Law’s sentence would take the British deaths into account, and warned that extradition was “far from guaranteed and would have taken years to conclude”. Specialist CPS prosecutor Andrew Hudson said including UK victims in the Canadian sentencing process was the “quickest and most effective route” to justice, noting that any UK prosecution could have been blocked under double jeopardy principles if Law was already convicted of similar offences in Canada.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) said Law shipped 330 products to the UK for 286 individuals, and that 79 victims in the UK were known to have died directly from his products, according to the CPS and NCA. Families including David Parfett have called for a public inquiry into the deaths, arguing that the scale of loss involving children and young people demands a coordinated effort to understand how such a trade operated and to prevent further harm.
How did Kenneth Law operate his online business?
Court documents and agreed facts outline that Law was the sole proprietor of four companies and ran multiple websites offering sodium nitrite and other substances, along with suffocation equipment, to people he met in online suicide forums. As reported by WalesOnline, one website advertised 40-minute consultations for $150 (£111) and provided “instructions” on use, while Law sometimes posted under the alias “Greenberg” to guide individuals from forums to his sites. Between January 2020 and mid-May 2023, nearly $290,000 in sales from his companies was deposited into his accounts, and the court heard that Law was aware buyers were likely to use the products for suicide.
Law’s arrest in May 2023 followed a complex, multi-agency investigation involving at least 11 law-enforcement bodies across around a dozen countries, including the UK, Italy and the US, and came a week after a Times of London investigation in which a journalist posed as a customer and alleged Law counselled on how to use his products to “best ensure death”. In a will compiled after the investigation began, Law wrote that he believed he was “helping people to alleviate their suffering while making a small modest profit”, a statement prosecutors and defence lawyers are expected to address in sentencing submissions.
What did survivors and families say about the impact?
Elisabeth Belien, a UK survivor who took a substance bought from Law at age 23, told the court her vulnerability had been exploited and that the experience had made it harder to trust others and herself. She described months of self-starvation as a form of punishment and said she still felt “a lot of shame” about what happened, while also expressing survivor’s guilt over those who died. In the Mirror, the mother of 25-year-old Imogen Nunn, who died on 1 January 2023 after taking a drug bought from Law, said the “man who sold poison to my suicidal daughter online should rot in hell”, reflecting the anger felt by some relatives over the plea deal and the absence of UK charges.
Families also spoke of practical and emotional consequences, including fear as parents, fractured marriages and the loss of shared family history. Adrienne Dalli said she had become a fearful parent, worried she would not spot signs if her own sons were struggling, while the Tuckers said the realisation that Henry’s suffering and death could have been averted was an “unbearable burden”. Norson Harris said the only solace was that Law had acknowledged his role in Ashleigh’s death, and Sandy Windsor expressed anger that her son died with only a call handler on the phone.
Background to the development
The case emerged from growing concern over the online sale of lethal substances, particularly sodium nitrite, which can be fatal when ingested in certain quantities and has been linked to a rise in suicides among young people in the UK and elsewhere. Law’s operation came to wider public attention after the Times investigation in early 2023, which prompted a coordinated response from international police forces and led to his arrest in May 2023. Canadian prosecutors initially charged Law with 14 counts of first-degree murder alongside 14 counts of aiding suicide, but in April 2026 a plea deal was reached under which the murder charges would be withdrawn after sentencing, following a separate Supreme Court of Canada ruling that affected the viability of murder prosecutions in similar circumstances.
In the UK, the CPS and NCA worked with Canadian authorities to ensure that British deaths were documented and included in the sentencing facts, even though no separate UK trial will take place. Support organisations including Mind Cymru, Samaritans and the Community Advice & Listening Line (C.A.L.L.) have been cited throughout coverage, with helpline details provided for readers affected by the issues raised.
Prediction: how this development can affect families, policymakers and online platforms
The sentencing outcome is likely to shape how families, policymakers and online platforms approach the regulation of harmful substances and the moderation of suicide-related content. For families, a lengthy sentence that explicitly acknowledges the 79 UK deaths may provide a measure of recognition, though some relatives have already indicated that no prison term will ease their grief or replace the loss of children and siblings. For policymakers in the UK and Canada, the case strengthens arguments for tighter controls on the online sale of chemicals such as sodium nitrite, enhanced age verification for certain purchases, and clearer duties for websites and forums that host or link to self-harm content.
For online platforms and payment processors, the scale of Law’s business multiple websites, forum activity under an alias, and international shipments may prompt more robust monitoring of suicide-related keywords, faster takedown of sites offering lethal means, and closer cooperation with law enforcement across borders. Mental health advocates may also use the case to press for greater investment in early intervention services, particularly for young people with complex neurodevelopmental or immune-related conditions such as PANS/PANDAS, where misdiagnosis and delayed treatment can increase vulnerability. In the longer term, the judgment could influence how courts in different jurisdictions treat cross-border online facilitation of suicide, especially where plea bargains are used to secure convictions while avoiding protracted extradition battles.
